![a pilot study eyespy a pilot study eyespy](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/40869231_A_tutorial_on_pilot_studies_The_what_why_and_How/links/0c9605294a52b4b37f000000/largepreview.png)
Conclusionsįindings demonstrate adolescent technology users’ views on several creative strategies to prevent or intervene with electronic harassment.
#A pilot study eyespy code
Code families emerged regarding people who could be involved in responses to electronic harassment: (1) Individuals targeted by electronic harassment, (2) Friends and bystanders, (3) Adults, and (4) Social media websites and policymakers. 91% of participants were female with a mean age of 15.3 years (SD = 1.3). ResultsĦ7 eligible adolescents completed the survey. We subsequently categorized codes into thematic code families to reach consensus about significant themes. Written responses were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach with an iterative comparative method to resolve any code discrepancies.
![a pilot study eyespy a pilot study eyespy](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/ZWkAAOSwaeRfeKXq/s-l400.jpg)
Participants were approached by research staff and asked to read a vignette about an adolescent target of electronic harassment, then write down ideas for helping the target and/or preventing the scenario. We conducted a qualitative survey of a purposeful sample of adolescents age 14 to 18 who were attending a video blogger convention in Seattle, Washington. The purpose of this study was to use a novel data collection approach to determine perspectives on electronic harassment intervention and prevention from a targeted group of highly engaged adolescent technology users. Evidence-based strategies to address electronic harassment are lacking, and few studies have incorporated adolescent input into intervention design. depression, anxiety), and psychosocial (ex. headache, abdominal pain), psychological (ex. Electronic harassment affects 20–40% of adolescents and has been associated with significant negative outcomes including physical (ex.